fertwb.blogg.se - Adobe lightroom to corel aftershot pro transfer

#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER UPGRADE#
#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER FULL#
#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER PC#
#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER PLUS#
#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER DOWNLOAD#

LR is much slower regarding nearly all features/aspects.

ASP is at least double as fast as LR, especially Zooming in using the Mouse Wheel is smooth with my 24 MP pictures.

What I have discovered so far using the 3 tools: But for now Linux and Apple are not really 100% compatible). Waiting for the day, when I don't need it anymore. (Windows 7 SP1 is running in a VMWare Image with 8GB RAM.

#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER PC#

My PC is a Core-i7 950 with 16GB RAM and 3 SSD's, a NVidia 590GTX running openSuSE 12.3. My photos are coming from two cameras, the A77 and the RX100MKII. But there are plans for a native build in the future. The current version 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 is not available for Windows yet. There was temporarily a Windows version of Darktable available in the web, which I couldn't find (a friend of mine tested it and said, that it worked stable).

DT = Darktable 1.2.1 (Linux, packaged for openSuSE).

I can tell a few things about ASP and Darktable on openSuSE and LR on Windows 7. Otherwise LR.Īpologies in advance for my English - if someone wonders about my writing style, please keep in mind, my native language is German. However, IMHO, if you can stick with ASP and covers you in anything what you want, then go with it.

#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER DOWNLOAD#

The best thing for you is to download both trials (ASP is quite small) and see for yourself. ASP (in fact Bibble 5 Pro rebranded) is a "fresh" newcomer which covers some areas in which LR has problems (speed, catalog management, layered editing come in mind). Also, the LR's GUI is much more shiny (ornaments, more animations etc.). Generally speaking, LR is more bloated, slow and more mature. Export to other targets (email etc.): LR only.

#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER FULL#

ASP allows you to specify full custom processing settings to apply before saving as JPEG/TIFF.

EDIT: Both give keyword sets for Outdoor/Wedding/Custom etc.

LR gives you the last 9 keywords used and the entire keyword tree in place to pick from it.

ASP has Shortcut assignment for keywords.

Lens Correction: LR has slightly more lenses.

Plugins: ASP is better (you can have plugins for the entire image processing pipeline).

Noise Removal: ASP better (IMHO - it has several ways including Noise Ninja OOTB).

Straighten: ASP much better (in fact, LR doesn't have but one could fake it).

Layered editing: ASP only EDIT:(however you can have masks on each layer).

Local editing: The following two are competing.Importing: ASP no need to import to do enough tasks with files.LR - sloooow (on Core i5 3550, 16GB RAM, Win7) I understand there might be some subjectiveness into this, please let me know with comments if there's any interest in making the answer a collaborative wiki.ĪfterShotPro 1.0.1 = ASP, Lightroom = LR 4.1 (sorry I don't have personal experience with DarkTable) There is more than just the features for instance I hear color management on Linux is hard - I don't want to launch an off-topic discussion about it, but if there's a very strong agreement on such a point it will be an issue against DarkTable(edit: i investigated and it's actually false). Price is of course an element of the comparison, but only at an equal feature point.

My experience though is that it takes way more than 30 days to discover the real features AND limitations of this kind of software. I do know that lightroom is great and that you don't get wrong with that -), and that I could test drive all of them.

#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER PLUS#

I'm wondering whether somebody has been able to test them all (or most!) and provide a first-person feedback on which features stand up / are lacking in comparison, plus any additional experience advise in comparing these software. (I do not have a mac so Aperture is not an option)

Rawtherapee free open source edit: lacking catalogue.

DarkTable free open source (multiplatform linux/mac/windows).

Corel AfterShot Pro now on sale at 59.9$ from 99.9$.

I'm quite satisfied with Picasa as a catalogue, definitely not for any photo processing other thank a quick saturation and sharpening bumb, but without local edits it does not work all the time.

I'll be trying to shot more raw as soon as I realize that, with the appropriate tool, the result is worth it over in-camera jpg conversion.

enhance my pics (mostly jpg*) with a fair balance of feature vs.

The basic of what I'm looking into is a step-up, single stop (if possible!) solution to:

#ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO COREL AFTERSHOT PRO TRANSFER UPGRADE#

I understand that I should upgrade from my basic workflow (mostly Picasa + some Cyberlink PhotoDirector).